Rigel wrote:
|
Bukhari of the 20th century!
|
Lol mate, no man, i do not think that he is acting as Bukhari acted, Bukhari was a hadith maniac, H Y cannot be, what I find questionable regarding him after watching that video 2 times, are the followings:
1) His wearing of Gold and very expensive cloth, the Arab host raised this issue many times and H Y ignored to trnalsate it in his trnalsation
2) His explanation of showing his wealth is questionable because he made his act similar to prophet Solaiman actions when he was showing his wealth, then later:
3) The reason he gave to explain why he is not married yet, in which he said that he does not have time for wives while serving Allah, while prophet Solaiman whom he made himself similar in the actions of showing wealth to serve Allah, was married to hundreds of women
4) The allegation of his cocaine use and dealing may not be completely true but I beileive that it may not be completely false either
5) His surrounding with young males considering the fact that he is not married
6) His admission that his books are not his writings rather 95% by others as to why then he never mention the others
Very strange man, I am shocked indeed
Salam
- Sun 04 Jan, 2009 8:55 am
Post subject:
The similarity I see is both are hearsayers and as it is that his "books are not his writings rather 95% by others as to why then he never mention the others", he is worse than bukhari for not even mentioning others.
You know what couple of years ago I read this work and was impressed, since my barbar is from Turkey I asked him about him. And my barbar laughed and said this man only likes young and rich. Thereafter I thought his work cant be his, because one man cannot research so many tables and right over 200books.
Well now I can guess what my barbar said.
salam
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Powered by phpBB 2.0 .0.17 © 2001
phpBB
Group